Board of directors' responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence from shareholder proposals Journal Article uri icon



  • In recent years boards have become significantly more likely to implement non-binding, majority-vote (MV) shareholder proposals. Using a sample of 620 MV proposals between 1997 and 2004, we find that shareholder pressure (e.g., the voting outcome and the influence of the proponent) and the type of proposals are the main determinants of the implementation decision, while traditional governance indicators do not seem to affect the decision. We then examine the labor market consequences of the implementation decision for outside directors and find that directors implementing MV shareholder proposals experience a one-fifth reduction in the likelihood of losing their board seat as well as other directorships.

publication date

  • February 1, 2010

Date in CU Experts

  • September 6, 2013 10:25 AM

Full Author List

  • Ertimur Y; Ferri F; Stubben SR

author count

  • 3

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 53

end page

  • 72


  • 16


  • 1