Comparison of strain recovery techniques for the mixed iterative method Journal Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • AbstractThree strain recovery techniques are investigated in the framework of the mixed iterative method. The need for appropriate strain recovery for low‐order elements is shown. The three techniques compared are: C‐lumping, strain‐smoothing and a new technique called C‐splitting. It is shown that the use of C‐lumping has negative effects on the convergence of the mixed iterative method. Both strain‐smoothing and C‐splitting deliver convergent results, but the new technique converges faster.

publication date

  • November 1, 1993

has restriction

  • closed

Date in CU Experts

  • December 3, 2013 9:41 AM

Full Author List

  • Červenka J; Keating SC; Felippa CA

author count

  • 3

Other Profiles

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1069-8299

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1099-0887

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 925

end page

  • 932

volume

  • 9

issue

  • 11