Retrospective reflections of a whistleblower: opinions on misconduct responses. Journal Article uri icon



  • Almost 10 years ago, when I was in my fourth year of graduate school, my fellow graduate students discovered that our thesis advisor had engaged in misconduct by falsifying and fabricating data in two grant applications. We informed the university and my advisor resigned. This event was a turning point in my life. Years later, I have gathered my thoughts and reflections on the experience. I believe we must first prevent what misconduct we can. But unfortunately some misconduct will still occur and in those circumstances we must respond to protect those affected by the misconduct and to progress beyond the event. In so doing, we get the most value out of scientific research.

publication date

  • January 1, 2013

has subject area

has restriction

  • closed

Date in CU Experts

  • October 14, 2013 11:38 AM

Full Author List

  • Allen M; Dowell R

author count

  • 2

Other Profiles

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1545-5815

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 339

end page

  • 348


  • 20


  • 5-6